It’s not just about Ghost in the Shell and Dr. Strange. This great Vox video examines Hollywood’s long, unfortunate history of casting white actors in Asian roles, and why it matters.
A few weeks ago, while preparing to speak to a band called Mothxr, I came across an interview they’d given a couple of months earlier. In it, they were asked their favourite thing to see in the audience from onstage – and their answer was all too familiar. “Guys!” they said. “I’m not kidding!” I wish they were.
“A balanced ratio of men to women,” they continued, “means we have music listeners in the audience. When it’s all girls of a certain age, it’s likely that our music might not be their primary interest.” It’s probably worth pointing out here that Mothxr’s lead singer is Penn Badgley – who rose to fame in the TV series Gossip Girl. His anxious desire to distance himself from a show he feels he’s outgrown is a common one. But so, too, are comments like that.
Speaking to Rolling Stone at the end of last year, 5 Seconds of Summer estimated that “75% of our lives is [spent] proving we’re a real band. We’re getting good at it now. We don’t want to just be, like, for girls.” In order to prove themselves as a “real band” (apparently for the time being, they’re merely a figment of teenage girls’ imagination) they must gain the approval of men. Already, they explained proudly, they’re “seeing a few male fans start to pop up”. What an incredible moment that must be for them – to glimpse a man among a sea of female frivolity, each Y chromosome taking them one step closer to credibility. Never mind that they wouldn’t have been doing this interview if it wasn’t, like, for the girls that bought their records.
Still, it’s not exactly 5 Seconds of Summer’s fault that they’ve got such a distorted view of things. After all, they’re operating in a culture in which teenage girls are seen as the lowest common denominator of music fan. A culture in which older men are the bastions of good taste, the brave protectors of real music – while young women’s enthusiasm is dismissed as a sort of mass hysteria, blocking their ability to discern good from bad.
As a reviews editor, I’ve lost count of the number of times writers have – while bemoaning a gig’s drawbacks – referred derisively to the amount of “teenage girls” in the crowd. It’s as if that phrase itself is a code that needs no further explanation, no elaboration as to why a young woman’s fully paid-up presence at the gig is, unquestionably, a bad thing. It isn’t. Their judgments are just as legitimate, their enthusiasm just as credible, even if their screams are a little louder. And if you think their taste is indiscriminate, you’d be wise to remember that for every One Direction, there’s a thousand other bands who tried and failed to gain even a fraction of their success.
This is the case now, as it was 40 years ago. After David Bowie died, my mum dug out a £1 ticket from a Bournemouth gig she’d been to as a 15-year-old, alongsidesome old BBC footage of the very same show. Bowie, says the segment’s narrator, is “an object that is worshipped by millions of girls”. Later he decries, his voice plummy and faintly horrified: “It is a sign of our times that a man with a painted face and carefully adjusted lipstick should inspire adoration from an audience of girls aged between 14 and 20. Everywhere.” At this point, the level of panic bubbling up in his voice suggests he’s worried they might be infectious – “there are the girls”. Cut to 43 years later, and it seems those girls were pretty spot on as far as that “bizarre, self-constructed freak” Bowie was concerned. Just as they were with the Beatles.
I’m not suggesting, of course, that every band adored by teenage girls in 2016 will go on to be universally revered. (For one thing, the taste of teenage girls is far from a monolithic entity.) I certainly don’t think, even if they keep up the impressive feat of gaining male fans, that 5 Seconds of Summer are likely to be remembered in the same way as Bowie. But they’re no less likely to do so than a band enjoyed solely by older men with furrowed brows and an extensive vinyl collection. To look out into a crowd, or into your Twitter mentions, and immediately discount the approval of young women, is a foolish thing to do. Don’t bite the hand that feeds.
After interviewing Mothxr, and tweeting my dislike for their sentiments on gender, I got an email from Penn Badgley. He wanted to explain that he was pushed into answering that question, and that his quote had been taken somewhat out of context, but more so, he wanted to apologise. And to let me know that he’d changed his mind. “Every great band ever,” he conceded, “has played for a predominantly young female audience, and that audience is appreciative and invested and willing to scream and dance with abandon. Which is the point of music.” It sure is.
People have been talking for quite some time about how The Room Where It Happens sounds like a Disney villain song, even though Burr is no villain.
And that’s completely true, because really, if we had to point out a villain for this song, Hamilton would be the one. In this solo little moment of his, he sounds pretty cruel; he taunts Burr, and invokes that ‘what do you want’ chorus that is just the most Disney villain sounding thing ever.
I like color. I think the designers are using color to enhance the messages in BBC Sherlock. It’s another (broad brush) pattern we can read to fill in the blanks.
We meet Sherlock in sharp neutral tones- black and white and gray. All brains/no sentiment, crisp and logical. One wall (almost black and white) dominates 221b with a large elaborate, highly structured pattern. This is the wall Sherlock pins his case notes on, the wall he stares at while he’s solving a mystery.
For quite a while I assumed these neutral tones, that boldly patterned “brain work” wall, represented Sherlock. Other colors swim around him- he is fascinated by Moriarty’s blue, he is warmed by John’s red. But Sherlock’s heart and mind are in the Work; and the Work is black and white deduction. Right? 🙄. Wrong. I got trapped in first impressions.
So… Where in 221b is Sherlock at ease; where can he be himself? His bedroom, and his kitchen/chemistry lab. Guess what? They’re both GREEN. (Actually, I think we see several shades of green on various walls in 221b, it is scattered throughout.)
Now that we have spent an entire green-soaked episode inside Sherlock’s Victorian Mind Palace, I think the message is clear. Sherlock pretends to be neutral- cool and detached- but his real self underneath is green. Gay carnation green, rich earthy lusty green, young springtime in love green. We’ve seen a lot of variations. When the designers give us green, they’re giving us authentic Sherlock.
So why the baroque big pattern wallpaper in 221b? Why S1-S2 Sherlock dressed in black and white? I think they’re pointing out the biggest influence in Sherlock’s life: Mycroft.
I’m sure lots of folks got this long ago, but I really just now saw it:
MYCROFT is the character whose color is “no color”. To the world, Mycroft is a neutral, unassuming, minor-position-in-the-government ghostly shadowy shade of gray. In Sherlock’s mind, Mycroft is a powerful, black-and-white controlling discipline that Sherlock both loves and hates. Mycroft looms large in Sherlock’s life, just like that wallpaper looms large in 221b.
We see Sherlock’s small rebellions on the Mycroft wall. He starts with decor: the momento mori skull floating in swimming pool blue. Later Sherlock vandalizes the overbearing wall with a yellow graffiti John smiley face, and shoots at it in a rage.
Amazing. Arwel and his team designed 221b to mirror Sherlock’s mental landscape. The kitchen/chem lab and Sherlock’s bedroom are green safe havens, but when Sherlock walks in the door, THERE is Mycroft’s wall staring down at him, inescapable. Directly opposite is Sherlock’s heart(h), beneath the mirror where he sees his true self (“it’s my face”). The wallpaper is a delicate pattern, warm red-gold-green woven together (a Johnlock promise, I think). And their two chairs, facing each other, together against the rest of the world.
(Now that I’m associating THAT wall in 221b to Mycroft, I’m remembering TAB. It was shimmery, wasn’t it? Difficult to see clearly, depending on the angle of light. Sometimes blue I think (danger!) with garish flowers. What is Sherlock’s subconscious telling him by putting that sooo changeable wallpaper on Mycroft’s wall?)
Tagging a few folks for your bemusement, I can’t believe I’m looking for character clues in wallpaper…!
Very pleased that that the 4 page paper I kinda last minute pulled out of my ass about the Sherlock fandom got me a 97/100. I had to critically analyze a digital media work that shows how it’s digital format affects human activity. So I wrote about the fandom and how we use digital media, since I’m kinda well versed in that.