“Are you hungover?” Eve Myles and John Barrowman @ Megacon [more torchwood cast]
Supernatural + what fourth wall?
Women invented all the core technologies that made civilization possible. This isn’t some feminist myth; it’s what modern anthropologists believe. Women are thought to have invented pottery, basketmaking, weaving, textiles, horticulture, and agriculture. That’s right: without women’s inventions, we wouldn’t be able to carry things or store things or tie things up or go fishing or hunt with nets or haft a blade or wear clothes or grow our food or live in permanent settlements. Suck on that.
Women have continued to be involved in the creation and advancement of civilization throughout history, whether you know it or not. Pick anything—a technology, a science, an art form, a school of thought—and start digging into the background. You’ll find women there, I guarantee, making critical contributions and often inventing the damn shit in the first place.
Women have made those contributions in spite of astonishing hurdles. Hurdles like not being allowed to go to school. Hurdles like not being allowed to work in an office with men, or join a professional society, or walk on the street, or own property. Example: look up Lise Meitner some time. When she was born in 1878 it was illegal in Austria for girls to attend school past the age of 13. Once the laws finally eased up and she could go to university, she wasn’t allowed to study with the men. Then she got a research post but wasn’t allowed to use the lab on account of girl cooties. Her whole life was like this, but she still managed to discover nuclear fucking fission. Then the Nobel committee gave the prize to her junior male colleague and ignored her existence completely.
Men in all patriarchal civilizations, including ours, have worked to downplay or deny women’s creative contributions. That’s because patriarchy is founded on the belief that women are breeding stock and men are the only people who can think. The easiest way for men to erase women’s contributions is to simply ignore that they happened. Because when you ignore something, it gets forgotten. People in the next generation don’t hear about it, and so they grow up thinking that no women have ever done anything. And then when women in their generation do stuff, they think ‘it’s a fluke, never happened before in the history of the world, ignore it.’ And so they ignore it, and it gets forgotten. And on and on and on. The New York Times article is a perfect illustration of this principle in action.
Finally, and this is important: even those women who weren’t inventors and intellectuals, even those women who really did spend all their lives doing stereotypical “women’s work”—they also built this world. The mundane labor of life is what makes everything else possible. Before you can have scientists and engineers and artists, you have to have a whole bunch of people (and it’s usually women) to hold down the basics: to grow and harvest and cook the food, to provide clothes and shelter, to fetch the firewood and the water, to nurture and nurse, to tend and teach. Every single scrap of civilized inventing and dreaming and thinking rides on top of that foundation. Never forget that.
Violet Socks, Patriarchy in Action: The New York Times Rewrites History (via o1sv)
Reblogging again for that paragraph because that is the part we forget the most.
(via girlwiki)
here’s a thing: I had literally no idea of johnlock/the concept of shipping/fandom communities/anything related to slash pairings before I watched sherlock, and after the first episode I went searching to see if they were/were going to be romantically involved in this version, or if that was even a thing. again: I went looking after ONE SINGLE EPISODE. I know I’m not the only one with that experience.
The meta is intelligent and well thought out, tjlc is amazing (and hilarious and brilliant and I adore it so, so much), but before the meta, before tjlc, there’s simply the show. And the show, on its merits alone, is what led me to the idea of sherlock/john. To me, the show stands by itself, and acting like tjlc is a delusion built by fangirls nitpicking at details is completely untrue.
The text of the show gives you a john who, 2 years later, still can’t visit baker street, it shows you drunk idiots straight up flirting on the stag night, it shows you a heartbroken sherlock after John’s wedding, it shows you that one month into a supposedly happy marriage john is cycling to work due to a bit of chafing, and it shows you sherlock building up to and deciding against a final declaration of love (seriously, what else was he going to say?) Those events textually happen IN THE SHOW, and while meta does wonders to expound on said events, to argue that tjlc and the idea of johnlock endgame are based solely on subtext, solely on tiny details, is simply false.
To me, the meta is the icing on top of the multi-layered and very dense cake of the narrative – and sure, you can have one or the other, but if your cake is awful, all the icing in the world isn’t going to be able to hide that. Essentially: meta and tjlc largely aren’t based on subtextual or tenuous connections, they’re based on the narrative structure itself, which I firmly believe supports johnlock endgame. Someone get me some damn cake.
lol 8-12 then, to make it easier on you.
I already did 9-11 😛
Twelve
Not My Type |Alright | Cute | Adorable | Pretty | Gorgeous | LORD MERCY

Eight
Not My Type |Alright | Cute | Adorable | Pretty | Gorgeous | LORD MERCY



































